🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.